In praise of the e-book
Hardcovers--why do people feel they're superior to paperbacks and e-books? I hate them. They're too heavy and bulky to carry in your purse, so you never have them with you when you want them. Their bindings are stiff, and the pages don't open fully, and they're unwieldy to hold-- hard on the eyes and arms and neck and hands. Plus they're expensive. And if you buy them secondhand or borrow them from the library, they're liable to harbor mites, lice, or bedbugs. Why would anyone want such a thing--in their hands or in their house?
The e-book, by contrast, is lightweight, totable, proppable, searchable, sanitary, and comfort itself to hold. And perhaps most miraculous, if you have a library card, you can hear about a book and in seconds grab it from the ether and begin to read it--before the title drops from your memory. And when you're done, you do not need to find a space to store it or remember to return it or find someone to pass it on to. It just disappears itself in the most accommodating way.
There are many things to deplore about the modern digital life, but there is at least one thing to extol: King Kindle.
The e-book, by contrast, is lightweight, totable, proppable, searchable, sanitary, and comfort itself to hold. And perhaps most miraculous, if you have a library card, you can hear about a book and in seconds grab it from the ether and begin to read it--before the title drops from your memory. And when you're done, you do not need to find a space to store it or remember to return it or find someone to pass it on to. It just disappears itself in the most accommodating way.
There are many things to deplore about the modern digital life, but there is at least one thing to extol: King Kindle.
Comments
Post a Comment